Debunking Viral Claim About the Talmud and Minors
6 min read
The swastika stands for evil and mass murder. So does the hammer and sickle.
Last week was bracketed by two anniversaries in the history of 20th-century totalitarianism.
Sunday was the centennial of the death of Vladimir Lenin. The architect of the Bolshevik Revolution and first ruler of the Soviet Union was 53 when he died of a brain hemorrhage on Jan. 21, 1924.
Saturday was the anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz, the extermination camp in Poland where 1.1 million victims were murdered by Nazi Germany between 1940 and 1945. The United Nations in 2005 designated Jan. 27 as International Holocaust Remembrance Day.
Why has the UN never dedicated a similar day of remembrance for the victims of communism?
The communist system introduced by Lenin has led to more slaughter and suffering than any other movement in history. For sheer murderous horror, there has never been a force to compare to it. The Nazis didn't come close. Adolf Hitler's regime eradicated 6 million Jews in the unprecedented genocide of the Holocaust. The Germans also killed at least 5 million non-Jews, among them ethnic Poles, prisoners of war, Romani people, and the disabled.
But the Nazi toll adds up to barely a tenth of the lives that have been extinguished by communist dictatorships. According to The Black Book of Communism, a magisterial compendium of communist crimes first published in France in 1997, the fanaticism unleashed by Lenin's revolution has sent at least 100 million men, women, and children to early graves. Beginning in 1917, communist regimes on four continents — from Russia and Eastern Europe to China and North Korea to Cuba and Ethiopia — engineered death on a scale unmatched in human annals.
Yet communism rarely evokes the instinctive loathing that Nazism does. To this day there are those who still insist that communism is admirable and wholesome, or that it has never been properly implemented, or that with all its failings it is better than capitalism. Many people who would find it unthinkable to deck themselves in Nazi regalia — when Britain's Prince Harry wore a swastika armband to a costume party in 2005, a major scandal ensued — view communist-themed fashion as trendy or kitschy.
Amazon sells T-shirts that make light of communist dictators like Lenin, Stalin, and Mao, who were among the greatest mass killers in history.
In Manhattan's East Village, the popular KGB Bar — named after the USSR's terrifying security network of secret police and torture sites — features Soviet propaganda posters and literary readings. Would any New York hipster ever set foot in a pub called Gestapo? Amazon sells scores of shirts with hammer-and-sickle designs or the images of communist dictators like Lenin, Stalin, and Mao, who were among the greatest mass killers in history. Search for "Nazi T-shirts," on the other hand, and what comes up are shirts showing a swastika in a red circle with a slash ("No Nazis") or proclaiming: "Punch a Nazi."
What accounts for the difference? Both Nazism and communism filled the world with pain, terror, and death. Yet communists are not regarded with the same revulsion that Nazis are. In the public's perception, Hitler and his Nazi Party have no equal as incarnations of supreme evil. Why isn't communist tyranny viewed the same way?
A number of reasons suggest themselves.
First: In the war against Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union ended up fighting alongside the Allies. World War II gave way to the long-drawn-out Cold War, but America's alliance with Moscow left in many minds the belief that when it mattered most, the communists were on our side. After all, the free world had labeled Nazis as the supreme evil. So anyone who helped destroy Nazis must not have been supremely evil themselves.
Second: The Nazis made little effort to disguise the abhorrent malignance on which their movement was based, above all its genocidal antisemitism. They made no secret of their implacable hatred for Jews and other "subhumans" or their belief that an Aryan master race should rule the world. Conversely, communist movements have almost always cloaked their malice and brutality with tempting rhetoric about equality, peace, and an end to exploitation. Partly as a result, the myth persists to this day that communism is really a noble ideology with the potential to liberate mankind.
Third: Nazism was utterly discredited by the fate meted out to Nazi Germany — unconditional surrender, an Allied occupation, war-crimes trials, and the hanging of senior Nazis. By contrast, communist dictatorships in Moscow and elsewhere entrenched their hold on power. The end of the Cold War eventually brought down communist governments in Russia and Europe, but even then, there was no public accounting for the ghastly crimes they had committed.
Fourth: The Holocaust became such a "byword for modern barbarism," as the authors of "The Black Book of Communism" put it, that even mass murders of greater magnitude in the communist world seem to recede in significance. In crucial ways, the Holocaust stands alone: Nazi Germany deployed every resource at its command to construct a vast industry of death with the goal of rounding up and destroying every single Jew in Europe — not as a means to an end but as an end in itself. There is good reason that so much attention has been paid to the Holocaust by scholars, historians, educators, and artists. As a result, however, the far greater level of bloodshed committed by communist regimes has never achieved the same public awareness.
Fifth: There are pictures of what the Nazis did. Filmmakers and photographers entered the death camps in 1945 and recorded what they found, providing images that shocked the world's conscience and became iconic emblems of human savagery. But there were no Allies to liberate the Soviet gulag or to halt the agonies of Mao's Great Leap Forward. If there are photos or films of those atrocities, few have ever seen them. The victims of communism have tended to be invisible — and suffering that isn't seen is suffering most people don't think about.
These are explanations only, not justifications. Nazism was unspeakably evil and only an ignoramus or a monster would deny it. Communism, too, has been unspeakably evil — no "ism" in history has spilled more blood or crushed more lives. From anyone with a conscience or a working moral compass, the response to both should be the same: Never forget, never forgive.
This op-ed originally appeared in the Boston Globe
The Nazis and Communists are 2 sides of the same evil. Arguing on which is worse is like arguing who is the biggest loser. Neither side win or both sides lose. On evil systems what about King Leopold II of Belgium who killed more people than Hitler? The only difference here is that King Leopold II paid his tidings to the church and hitler did not. We should also include religion in this circle of greatest evil because religion has caused far more death, suffering and cruelty and has enabled the greatest tyrants of the world for profit and power. Religion is the most evil creation by humans in history.
There is no such thing as a person without a religion. Religion comes from the greek and means worship...If you don't believe in a higher being you just believe in some other wordly thing like money or power. If you really want to remove religion you should go to North Korea. Even in North Korea there is a religion. People believe Kim being a God because there is nothing left to believe in since you'll get martyred if you express any belief in something else than it's government and I don't believe this is truly what you would want. There was never a point in time where a human didn't "worship" something. The best way to controll people is by removing religion in your sense of the term or by creating uninformed and ignorant people of a specific religion or group.
I know Hitler( may his name be erased) murdered Jews and non Jews also Stalin( may his name be erased) murdered Jews and non Jews they both murdered lots of people and were evil and terrible leaders and dangerous for their countries and maybe the world Hitler( may his name be erased) wanted to conquer the world maybe Stalin( may his name too) too
How did the Soviet Union "end up" fighting Nazis, when they joined the war before the Allies, and unlike the Allies, they were actually attacked savagely first?
Nazi crimes were their openly stated goal, while Socialist "victims" were just side-effects of actual policy. Funny, when NATO kills scores of civilians (millions by some estimates), they are never referred to as "victims", but "collateral damage", because they "weren't the intended victims". Funny that.
The Allies joined the European battles only AFTER the USSR started gaining advantage in the East, if that hadn't happened, Nazis would get to keep all they stole.
Also, to believe nazism was discredited when there is clearly a modern resurgence of it is....ridiculous.
Have fun relativizing actual horrors of history.
Initially Stalin wanted to have a treaty with France and the UK. France and UK did not trust Stalin and did not want to get dragged into another war.
So Stalin signed a treaty with Hitler to carve upt Europe into spheres of influence. Both Hitler and Stalin started making plans to invade other countries. When Stalin tried to invade Finland they showed themselves to have an inferior military. Hitler saw Russia and very wealk and then planned his invasion of Russia.
SIDE NOTE: In February 2023 when Putin invaded Ukraine the world saw that Russia learned nothing.
What amazing and so illustrative article... Thank you!
The article numbers are biased for the both sides.
Although the Holocaust was the major Nazis' crime, it was only part of the WWII. The total number of victims of that war, for which Nazism is responsible (including also Germans or Japanese themselves) was 70-85 million people according to the latest Wikipedia estimates.
The Wikipedia latest estimate of the premature deaths under Communist regimes is 65 million.
Although the latter number is horrible, it is less than that of the Nazism victims, and is much less as %-age, considering huge Chinese population. This is the opposite of Jeff Jacoby's conclusions.
And let's not forget who committed the Holocaust: it was Nazism, not Communism.
Anyway, the paper started the important discussion. As the Talmud says, "Kol hatchalot kashot".
You made my day Jeff Jacoby, and I feel less alone. The topic you evoke here is a personal crusade since I read the Black Bible of Communism. Another strange fact is that our western world has recruited after WWII a lot of nazis, erasing their crime. When instead numerous communist infiltrations in the same world has always been considered a tragedy when discovered. It seems our western leadership use a strange scale in this matter. Thank you so much.
Deaths under communism is a broad catch all， for which deaths under capitalism due to famine and war would likely equal or surpass. But such authors assume people will not have time to look into such details. Still it is helpful that aish clailrifies its true colors again and again, a right wing platform that disguises its agenda with new age style jewish-light flavoring.
You have to be so ideologically leftist to put out a comment like this that truth is no longer part of your lexicon. Sure, there are wars and famines, but why would you even mention this? All governments and countries, regardless of their political bent will deal with these issues because they're universal to every society. But you completely miss the point of what is so completely evil about communism and its pupal state, socialism. The vast, vast majority of people killed by these regimes, Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao, Castro, et. al, were their own people. They slaughtered anyone within their own countries they deemed a threat or who didn't conform to their societal goals, authoritarian control of everyone. And if not killed, re-educated, not sure what was worse. You really need to wake up.
You write the truth like it is
There are no "deaths under capitalism." Capitalism has to do with numbers. It is an economical ideology. There are no emotions involved.
You are right
This is an excellent article. I knew communism had caused more death and misery but over a much longer period of time. People don't acknowledge this generally because there are fewer records or photographs. It was good to have a clear 'timeline' and comparison. Thank you, Jeff Jacoby.
It should never be ignored that Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia conspired together to start World War Two. The kind of disparity of contempt for and between the two totalitarianisms, doesn't exist in Poland, Finland and the Baltic countries.
I think first they were on the same side, but Germany broke the pact and attacked Russia, that saved the world and made Germany lose the war the brutal Russian winter did them in
Professor Rudolf Rummel recorded the statistics of democide by various types of regimes. Liberal democracies do have their own sins of political killing but on the whole far less than have the authoritarian regimes which themselves have been outdone by the totalitarian regimes. Both Nazism and Communism were arch totalitarian regimes. The main difference is that the Nazis had only 12 years of power whereas Communism reigned for over 70 years in Russia and still rules China since 1949.
Do you even know now Putin Russian president that used be in the KGB and murders/ kills his opponents they mysterisly die and he gets away with it, did anyone know this fact it is sad that he never got caught
I think Russia, China, North Korea two are definitely communism, in Russia Putin is a dicator but communism I am not sure about